Tuesday, 17 October 2017

The Blame Game

The Blame Game


Why do we feel more comfortable blaming victims than abusers?


"Blame is the discharging of discomfort and pain. It has an inverse relationship with accountability. Blaming is a way we discharge anger." Brene Brown

This is a complex social and psychological issue with many layers and depths. The truth is it is undoubted more comfortable to blame the victims, or society at large or anyone really. In avoiding our own accountability we slide our shame, as well as the abusers shame onto the victim. It's tidy. The powerful stay powerful. The weak, get weaker and we can pretend it's out of our control (while controlling it).

Culturally we minimise, deflect and protect ourselves and those we care about from the ire of the powerful with silence and shame. Our silence and silencing victims. Our shame and the shame put on the victim.

We are programmed not to challenge authority, even when we know it's wrong. While looking for the psychological studies that prove exactly this point I found hundreds of blogs, articles and curriculum to teach children to "respect authority".  School in particular teaches this blind obedience to our "betters". Stand in line! Do as you are told! I'm right, because I say so (even when I am wrong). We learn early and model our social groups around this power structure. It is exceptional difficult to break this kind of conditioning. Yet it is also vital to do so.
Psychologically we also prefer the narrative where we can imagine we and our loved ones are safe, even if it is an incredibly damaging lie. It gives us a control over events that are not within our power. The thought that only slutty, bad, stupid, silly, immoral, pretty, pushy, weak, and so on are victims is a way to insulate ourselves and loved ones from something terrible. It "protects" us from the horrid reality that anyone can be a victim. It seems too random. Too paralysing to be true.
This way of thinking is of just as traumatic as the abuse itself.
It also leads people to minimise abuse to be able to hold themselves and those they care about within those careful place holder's in their mind.
"My daughter is a good girl, good girls don't get raped, so she can't have been."
This added trauma of trying to twist our ideas of victimhood about ourselves and others and our own narrative can pull and push so hard it breaks people.
We see abuse victims try and "make themselves ugly" or "be too strong to be a victim" only to fall fowl of abuser or abuse again because the truth, which is so much more scary, is that it is not in the control of the victims at all.
If you were mauled by a wild bear, that happened to stumble into where you work, no-one would blame you for not wearing a safer clothing option. It wouldn't be a moral judgement placed on you, it would be an outrage that the bear was allowed to roam around hurting people.

The truth is that predators walk amongst us. That they can and do wear human faces. That they can be charming or bullying. They understand power and gather power to aid their ability to get away with hurting and harming their "prey" (that's us by the way).

You can learn to defend yourself. Make yourself look like a troublesome target. Yet if the predator wants to attack you, they will usually find a way. The only way to stop this is for those who see what has happened to speak up. To alarm and alert that there is a predator and to remove it. Whether it is firing them, putting them in prison or something else.
I know it's hard. I know it goes against much of our conditioning but we must begin to see the problem is the abuser. That anyone can be a victim. Our silence is deafening and it's deadly.


Sunday, 15 October 2017

Consent

Consent

Harvey Weinstien is a sexual predictor. He is a powerful bully who threatened or bought compliance even over powerful men (like the NY DA who dropped his case against Weinstein after a sizeable donation). Yet his favourite "prey" were young and powerless women. From models to receptionist, to actors and directors, as long as they were young, pretty and compared to him, powerless, he pursued them.
He (like a serial killer) had a favoured ruse to get these women alone with him. Though he was not rooted to this ritual exclusivity. First he would flatter, then he would bully and then he would strike.

"What about the women who had sex willingly to get the parts? Disgusting!"


If you are tricked, bullied or too frightened to say no, this is NOT consent.
If someone lies to you about the reason you are in a space with someone "just coffee" or "working on a project or script" to trap you in a room with them, this is not consent.
If someone threatens, bullies or bars the door, this is not consent.

The idea that women have the power to consent in these situations is just clearly not true. The threat of physical violence, social or career destruction if they continue to fight or reject these advances can be deadly and we need to remember that.
The very real fear that something worse could happen if they don't comply doesn't mean they consent.

They are not willingly, sexually interacting with this person. It's not a date. It's not respectful or fun. It's a terrifying choice.

"I trapped you here under false pretences and I will "destroy" you if you reject me ."

Someone in that situation can comply. They can take it, smile and get out, but they could not have consented. In a culture where saying no to men's unwanted advances can get you killed, doubly so powerful men, it is clear women under these conditions can not consent.

Women who complied with his "desires" long enough to safely leave are just as much his victims as those who fought and screamed and ran. They are too ashamed (they carry the predators shame) to come forward and who can blame them.
The real threat of violence (social or otherwise) now makes them subject to the full force of the public (and in particular men's) hate and ire. They may even have profited temporarily, or accepted his gifts. Compounding the blame and shame they already carried, making them feel compliance was consent.

It is of course easy to victim blame. It makes us more comfortable to place the blame with the weak, rather than the powerful. Challenging powerful authority figures is educated out of us from a young age.Yet it needs to stop.

We need to really understand how compliance is not consent. A robot can not consent. It can comply. If a victim loses the power to say no, to leave safely, to live as they did before, they can comply but they can not consent.

If you need to lie, bully, threaten or trick someone into having sex with you, you have robbed them of the power of consent.

My heart goes out to the many victims out there silenced still by the culture of blame-shifting and victim hating. My words are simply this. You complied but didn't consent and you are not to blame.